Fasting turned to Feasting: The Lord’s Supper

“When the communion-table shall be uncovered, you will see before you, in the emblems of the death of our Lord, what might have been the memory of a fast. The Lord of life and glory was nailed to the accursed tree. He died by the act of guilty men. We, by our sins, crucified the Son of God. The memory of Christ would therefore seem to be all funereal. We might have expected that, in remembrance of his death, we should have been called to a long, sad, rigorous fast. Do not many men think so even to-day? See how they observe Good Friday, a sad, sad day to many; yet our Lord has never enjoined our keeping such a day, or bidden us look back upon his death under such a melancholy aspect. Instead of that, having passed out from under the old covenant into the new, and resting in our risen Lord, who once was slain, we commemorate his death by a festival most joyous. It came after the passover, which was a feast of the Jews; but unlike that feast, which was kept with unleavened bread, this feast is brimful of joy and gladness. It is composed of bread and of wine, without a trace of bitter herbs, or anything that suggests sorrow and grief. The bread and the cup most fitly set forth the death of our Lord and Saviour, and the mode of that death, even by the shedding of his blood; but as they stand before us now, they evoke no tears, they suggest no sighs. The memorial of Christ’s death is a festival, not a funeral; and we are to come to the table with gladsome hearts, ay, and go away from it with praises, for “after supper they sang a hymn.” At both ends it was psalm-singing. The great Hallel of the Jews commenced it, and another psalm, full of joy and gladness out of the hallelujahs of the psalms, finished it. Oh, what hath God wrought! We crucified the Christ of God; but in that crucifixion we have found our ransom. With wicked hands he was slain by us; but his blessed sacrifice hath put all our sin away for ever”

Spurgeon on Zechariah 8:19, Sad Fasts Changed to Glad Feasts

Calvin, Weekly Communion, and the Scottish Reformed Tradition

Are those who advocate weekly communion simply following the desire of John Calvin? Was communion in Scotland only celebrated less frequently due to a lack of ministers? Many would answer ‘yes’ to both those questions – but despite what we’re often told, the facts don’t seem to back that up. Adam Kuehner of Southfield RPCNA (Michigan) has written a booklet (30 pages) on the issue which is today available to download as a free PDF. In it, Kuehner shows that for both Calvin and the Scottish Reformers (and those who followed), proper fencing of the table was more important than the frequency of the celebration. In fact, delaying the Easter communion in order to properly fence the table was what got Calvin and Farel banished from Geneva. While exiled in Strasbourg, Calvin pastored a local congregation and opted for monthly communion, even though the city council allowed Bucer to serve it weekly.

All that being said, none of this provides historical precedent for only having communion a few times a year. Kuehner (whose congregation celebrates communion 6 times a year) points out:

It should be noted that Scottish communion frequency is too often viewed in a simplistic manner. Some rural Scottish congregations celebrated the Lord’s Supper only once or twice per year, while others kept a quarterly schedule. Nevertheless, the common practice of parishioners communing in adjacent parishes meant that many were able to commune more frequently than four times per year. This fact is often overlooked.